“Life as a female is about more than finding the perfect outfit.”

mhGtJC8Lest anyone think that I’m on this mission solo, today I want to share a bit of my wife Amy’s perspective on what we’re doing with regard to gender bias and raising our kids, particularly our three girls.

Amy is a writer. And a good one. Don’t believe me? Buy this and you’ll see!

#shamelessplug

She’s also a blogger. And she writes a book review every month for the good folks at Kidville.

This month, the theme was “A Book for Your Creative Thinker,” and Amy profiled the book Rosie Revere, Engineer. The whole post is a worthy read, but here’s the part about parenting and gender:

“How to use this book with your kids: Having three girls means that I am always looking for books that can counteract the Disney Channel culture they love so much. Life as a female is about more than finding the perfect outfit. In this book, we see a girl who is passionate about building, constructing, inventing…things that our culture has traditionally classified as male attributes. So I like being able to point to Rosie as someone who is pursuing a dream that is outside of gender boxes. There are also a ton of historical references in this book, being that Rosie is an obvious nod to Rosie the Riveter. So if you are feeling especially ambitious, you can talk with your kids about the role of women in World War II, as well as women who played a key part in the evolution of the airplane and flight.”

Good, right?

I love challenging Tertullian together!

This is a Picture

Screen Shot 2014-01-19 at 7.02.01 AM

This is a picture that caught my eye the other day.

This is a picture that speaks the proverbial thousand words. Words like joy. Freedom. Partnership. Mutuality. Respect.

This is a picture of Reverend Anne Robertson, a pastor in the United Methodist Church, anointing the head of Sean O’Malley, Cardinal of Boston. O’Malley invited Reverend Robertson to offer him a reaffirmation of his baptism (story here) after he had done the same for her.

This is a picture of male privilege being joyfully overturned. It’s a picture of a man laying down his power, willingly submitting himself to the leadership of a woman. It’s a picture of Tertullian being challenged.

This is a picture of vision. Of a future that we could one day see. What if one day it becomes as normal for women to bless men as it is for men to bless women today?

Most of all…

This is a picture of hope.

Every Advocate Needs an Advocate

mhGyknC-1These two things are true:

I love to advocate for others.

I’m less able to receive advocacy from others.

So, really, I’m trying to grow in both of these things. I want to be a better advocate, particularly for the women in my life. And, I want to receive someone else’s advocacy with grace.

In that spirt, I want to thank my friend and colleague Jessica Fick for her generosity in hosting me on her blog yesterday, with a post about…advocacy. And what’s in it for me.

I’d love it if you’d head over to Jessica’s blog here and take a look. To whet your appetite, here’s the few paragraphs:

Over the years, it has been my joy to advocate for women around me, both in my life and in my ministry context. Indeed, using the power, privilege and access that culture gives me because of my gender to advocate for women has been a transformational experience, both for me and the women around me.

For me, advocacy has meant empathizing when a colleague has been hurt because of negative gender stereotypes.

Advocacy has meant theological engagement with people who are asking women in my life and ministry to take back seat because of their gender. One time, I endured a 2 hour debate highlighted by me being repeatedly called a “false teacher” because of my position on the issue.

Advocacy has meant intentionally investing in women, mentoring them and developing their leadership gifts.

Advocacy has meant hiring women into leadership roles in my organization, leveraging my positional power to gain for them some measure of such power. For instance, when I started leading my current ministry team, there was one woman. Last Fall, during a meeting, I looked around and realized I was the only man in the room.

The bottom line, then, is that I see advocacy for the women around me as a key part of my ministerial calling. After all, advocacy is a Biblical idea. Proverbs 31:8 reads like this: “speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, ensure justice for those being crushed.”

But here’s the thing…I’m no hero….

Click here to find out why!

Who is this Jesus?

mg1UmvUSo I had a run-in with Tertullian this week.

There I was, reading author and pastor John Ortberg’s recent book Who is this Man?, and I came across this quote, from Tertullian, describing how early Christians became known for their love and compassion:

“It is our care of the helpless, our practice of loving kindness that brands us in the eyes of our opponents.”

Pretty good right? I mean, may it be so today!

Don’t get me wrong. I wish Tertullian had applied the thought to the women in his day, that his vision for the “brand” was not gender specific. But as a stand alone quote, it’s pretty solid.

And it’s certainly true of Jesus.

In chapter 4, Ortberg puts Jesus’ treatment of women under the microscope. As he does, it’s clear that Jesus not only treats women with compassion, but also with dignity, respect and trust. In many ways, Jesus turns the prevailing culture regarding women on its head.

For instance, here’s Ortberg’s take on how Jesus empowered women to serve alongside men in his ministry, from Luke 8:1-3:

“Jesus offered women a new community.

‘After this, Jesus traveled about from one town and village to another, proclaiming the good news of the kingdom of God. The Twelve were with him, and also some women…: Mary (called Magdalene)…; Joanna the wife of Chuza, the manager of Herod’s household; Susanna; and many others. These women were helping to support them out of their own means.’

We can overlook how shocking this arrangement would have been in the ancient world. Women did not travel with men. They often were encouraged to simply remain indoors…

Jesus had women and men travel and study and learn and do ministry together. Imagine what kind of rumors flew around.”

Indeed.

As I’ve begun engaging issues of male privilege in particular and gender equality and partnership more broadly, sometimes I find myself primarily speaking the language of sociology. After all, there’s culture to critique, social interactions to reconsider and language to challenge.

So, now and then, it’s important to remember that this is all about Jesus.

Fully engaged as the incarnate God.

Free with power.

Friend to women.

Jesus.

Theologizing

mgyU0scHave I mentioned that I’m seeking to enroll in a doctoral program?!?

It’s true. I’m applying right now for the Doctor of Missiology program at Fuller Theological Seminary. The DMiss is a four-year missiology degree. It’s designed for in-service leaders; as such it’s primarily online with yearly residencies in Pasadena. The big idea is to tackle a missological problem, with an eye toward practical and concrete solutions.

Sounds like a hoot, huh? More about this later on, but if you’re interested you can check the program out here.

Turns out that part of the application process is reading three missiology texts (this one, this one and this one), and then writing a 10 page paper that summarizes, compares and evaluates. It’s quite a project.

The other day I was reading one of the texts, and I came across this passage, about gender, equality and God’s nature:

“Human beings are sexually differentiated. It is significant that the only specific explanation of the image of God is that it exists as ‘male and female’ (Gen. 1:27). ‘The primeval form of humanity is the fellowship of man and woman’ (Jewett 1975:36)

In other words, the dynamic interaction and fellowship between men and women is a fundamental reflection of the divine image. We cannot conclude that the woman was inferior, either by nature or by function. That she was created to be man’s ‘helper’ (Gen 2:20) does not mean that she must be ‘subject’ to him. The word helper is used elsewhere of God as Israel’s ‘help and shield’ in time of trouble (e.g., 1 Sam 7:12 and Ps. 33:20). ‘It describes a relationship of mutual interdependence, rather than the woman existing for the male’s convenience, or as his underling’ (Kuhns, 1978:17).

God’s ideal is that human beings enjoy positive social interaction and ongoing cooperation with one another in spontaneous obedience to the will of God. Only thereby can they truly incorporate the image of God.” (emphasis mine)

Taken from Announcing the Kingdom: The Story  of God’s Mission in the Bible, by Arthur Glasser, p. 35.

Shame on Old Spice

mOvNYg2Yesterday was a football watching day in the Dixon house.

For the record, we were pulling for San Diego and Green Bay. #mixedresults

But of course watching football games means watching the commercials that attend the broadcast. And, unfortunately, this too often means enduring gender bias and sexism. I’ve made this observation before (here and here), but this time, the Tertullian Award for Inappropriateness in Commercial Advertising goes to (drumroll please):

Old Spice.

And specifically to its “Momsong” commercial, part of its “Spray Goodbye to Boyhood” campaign.

If you dare, the commercial is here.

When this ad came on, my first response was to head out to the living room, where our 11-year old son was watching the game on a different TV. As has become our practice when he and I debrief these kinds of things, I asked him this question:

“Josh, what do you think that commercial trying to tell you?”

He thinks then says, “What it means to be a man.”

I reply, “And what does Old Spice say is involved in being a man?”

Pause. Uncomfortable look. “Ummm. Kissing girls?”

Kissing girls.

Or, more to the point, according to the commercial, “when our sons have fun with women and misbehave.”

Needless to say, we won’t be buying Old Spice any time soon. Heck, maybe we need to avoid any of the 50 or so Proctor & Gamble brands.

Because here’s the thing:

There’s more to being a man than chasing (or having fun with) women. 

Say it again. There’s more to being a man than chasing women.

Reducing “manhood” down to merely the carnal instinct to chase women, especially with the connotation of inappropriateness, doesn’t serve anyone, male or female. Not only does it neglect every other aspect of what it means to be a man, it also perpetuates the man as hunter/woman as quarry narrative, one that too easily and often becomes toxic.

It’s the last thing I want my son to see!

Yesterday, I tweeted at Proctor & Gamble and Old Spice three times to no avail. I’ll keep trying. When the game was over, I breathed a sign of relief, glad that we wouldn’t have to worry about that commercial any longer, and then it dawned on me.

There are more games next week.

2013 in Review

oosyYAoAs Challenging Tertullian steams into 2014, it’s good to look back at the year that was. Three observations:

First, it blows my mind that C.T. was viewed in 75 different countries last year. Top three were the U.S., the U.K. and Canada, but in this World Cup year, I’m glad to see people checking in from Brazil, Argentina, Germany and Italy. Most surprising countries? Probably Bolivia, Zambia and Myanmar.

Next, it’s clear that the blog’s front door is Facebook. At least that’s my top referring site. Second is Twitter, followed by (somehow) Pinterest.

Lastly, here are my top 5 posts from 2014, by the numbers. From looking at these topics, it seems clear you appreciate it when a take on male privilege in American pop culture!

1. On Really Respecting Someone. My post-Super Bowl brought in the most comments and readers.

2. And the Bummer is that I Really Like Those Western Bacon Cheeseburgers. Evidently, you all love a good boycott!

3. An Unwanted Conversation. Our 9 year old asked Amy, “Mom, when will I be allowed to dress sexy?” and many of you tuned to as I wrestled with the question.

4. On Mileygate. At the 2013 VMAs, Miley Cyrus was the one twerking, but in this post, I threw Robin Thicke under the bus.

5. On Really Seeing Someone. Almost a year ago, a good friend of mine expressed how she feels unseen when a letter arrives addressed to “Mr. and Mrs. <Husband’s Full Name>.’ Thankfully, Jesus really saw the women in his day, and he really sees women in our day.

Happy New Year, and thanks for being among the thousands of people who joined me in Challenging Tertullian in 2013!

Duck Disaster

mTAZ2DGOn Sunday, I came across this story, which featured Duck Dynasty Founder and star Phil Robertson saying some pretty brutal and sexist things about women.

You’ve probably heard about Phil and his Duck Dynasty crew. In the last couple of weeks, they have come under fire for Phil’s comments in GQ about homosexuals and African-Americans. If your Facebook wall is anything like mine, you’ve seen a lot of Duck Dynasty stories flying back and forth lately, many throwing Phil under the bus and others defending either his right to free speech or his views on faith.

To be honest, at first I was reluctant to write this post this morning. Why? Well, first because I am a complete Duck Dynasty rookie. I’ve never watched an episode. Next, because lots of people I know, respect and love really enjoy Duck Dynasty. And last because, come on, after reading what Phil said in GQ was there really any question what his views were or are about women?!?

But I thought I would post here because the Duck people are popular, because Phil’s quote in that article needs to be addressed and because the Duck Dynasty crew of perhaps the most visible professing Christians on TV right now.

And Christians seem to be overwhelmingly pro-Phil. One faith-based petition to reinstate a suspended Phil to his show garnered 250,000 signatures. And thousands of people liked a Facebook page entitled “Phil Robertson of Duck Dynasty-Christians Boycott A&E.” When Phil was reinstated to the show last week, the status read:

Screen Shot 2013-12-29 at 5.49.55 PM

 

 

 

 

 

Wow.

To be clear, here’s what Phil is quoted as saying about women:

“Make sure that she can cook a meal, you need to eat some meals that she cooks, check that out,” he said. “Make sure she carries her Bible. That’ll save you a lot of trouble down the road. And if she picks your ducks, now, that’s a woman.”

“They got to where they’re getting hard to find,” Robertson remarked. “Mainly because these boys are waiting until they get to be about 20 years old before they marry ‘em. Look, you wait until they get to be 20 years old, the only picking that’s going to take place is your pocket.”

The Duck Commander company founder added: “You got to marry these girls when they are about 15 or 16, they’ll pick your ducks. You need to check with mom and dad about that of course.”

Disturbing, right? Of course.

To his followers and maybe to himself, Phil represents Christianity and Christians in the public arena. Increasingly, he’s the (bearded) face and voice that culture associates with Jesus.

But here’s the thing:

At least in this area, Phil does not represent me.

I’ve blogged about these kinds of things before. When it comes to faith I’m sure I share plenty in common with Phil. But not everything. And, if what he says in this video clip accurately represents his perspective, we certainly don’t agree on this.

In fact, when it comes to women, I strenuously oppose his view. I think it’s narrow, short-sighted and, yes, sexist.  It’s wrong, demeaning and, I believe, un-Biblical. It’s the modern day voice of Tertullian.

So when it comes to issues of faith and women, Phil Robertson may well speak for lots of Christians.

Just not this one.

Why Mary?

1530406_10152130355195396_132925901_nIn a lot of ways, from a human perspective, the hero of the Christmas story is a woman.

There’s Mary. Unwed mother-to-be, at the very center of the messy drama of the Incarnation. I love Mary’s faithfulness. Don’t get me started on her beautiful worship hymn (here). Come to think of it, perhaps Mary is the first in a long line of gifted women worship leaders?!? Or, with a nod to Miriam, maybe Mary is one more link in a glorious chain that extends to today.

But as with much of the Christmas story, Mary is a strange choice as the protagonist. After all, shouldn’t the Messiah come through a couple–through a woman–blessed with power and means?!?

Like perhaps a Roman big wig? Luke mentions Tiberius the emperor and Pilate the governor. What about them? Wouldn’t it be wise to have the savior born as a citizen of the occupying nation? Heck, wouldn’t it be better just from a PR standpoint? I mean, really, shouldn’t the Messiah be born in a palace instead of a manger?

Or how about Herod, King of Judah? Surely, having Jesus born into the Judean king’s household makes far more sense. He’d be safe. He’d have resources. And, ultimately, he’d have a platform from which to influence, for as we know from Mathew’s Gospel (here), Herod’s son Archelaus succeeded his father to the throne.

Or the Jewish high priests would be sensible candidates. Luke identifies these men as Annas and Caiaphas (here). Most scholars think that Caiaphas was Annas’ son-in-law. What if that was Jesus instead?!? To rule the Temple was to have spiritual, judicial, economic and cultural influence. Surely having the baby Jesus born into the Temple elite would communicate the right message about his messianic mission?

Or, come to think of it, even Mary’s cousin makes more sense than Mary herself, married as she was to the priest Zechariah. What if Jesus had been born in place of John, with access to the religious establishment through his father?

Sensible? Wise? Strategic?

No way.

Instead, we have the manger, marginalization…..and Mary.

On Christmas, heaven was made manifest in the nitty gritty. And in choosing to have Jesus born unto a poor, unwed mother, the message of Christmas seems to be that:

Privilege is powerless in the economy of the incarnate God.

On Christmas Eve, our pastor quoted Luke 2:19, an interesting verse right in the middle of Jesus’ birth narrative:

“Mary kept all these things in her heart and thought about them often.”

I wonder if one of the things Mary pondered was why her, and what did that tell her about her God?!?

On Wading into the Mess

mqijYqWHave you ever stopped to think about how, well, messy the Incarnation was?

In  Jesus Feminist, Sarah Bessey writes:

“We keep it quiet, the mess of the Incarnation–particularly at Christmas–because it’s just not churchy enough, and many don’t quite understand. It’s personal, private, and there just aren’t words for it–and it’s a bit too much. It’s too much pain, too much waiting, too much humanity, too much God, too much work, too much joy or sorrow, too much love, and far too messy with too little control.”

I think she’s spot on. And anyone who has witnessed a birth knows it! The birthing process is a lot of things, but it’s certainly not clean, controlled, measured and clinical.

Instead, it’s messy. Very messy.

Beautiful, but messy.

And it seems to me that this is how it is when God breaks through. It’s beautiful and it’s messy.

Last year around this time, I wrote the following about Christmas:

“Let’s face it, for Jesus the Incarnation was a messy journey from power to powerlessness. Think about it. It’s a long way from the awesome trappings of Heaven to the sordid confines of Earth. In fact, Christmas marks the largest power exchange in human history.”

This year, I’m reflecting a bit more on the mess that comes with the Incarnation. Because the more I dig into this stuff, the more clear it becomes that this process of exchanging power is anything but clean and easy.

Here’s what I mean:

I open my eyes more fully to the injustice perpetuated every day against women…and it hurts. It’s hard to read the stories, and the solutions feel elusive and beyond me. I feel powerless. It would be much easier–much less messy–to remain blissfully unaware.

Or I willingly and even joyfully release my male privilege, intentionally choosing to release power so that others can flourish, only to be left withwhat? I’m not sure. After all, paradigm shifts are often messy. 

Or twice a week, every week, I write about male privilege, sending off my post and then wondering what you all think. That’s rarely an comfortable experience. Challenging Tertullian means it’s messy in my soul sometimes!

Or, lastly, I press into relationships across gender lines, trying to figure out how to have deep friendships and meaningful partnerships with the women in my life. Sometimes it feels like one step forward, two steps back.

All in all, it’s a messy business. Thankfully, it’s also a beautiful business.

Just like the Incarnation.